LMAO now that is rich! I have attempted to 'see the books' with no success whatsoever, as have many of my friends. I stand by my statement in any regard.

I'm not suggesting SAGA pay to take all its animals into see the private vet - only those in need of medicine or treatment until SAGA has another visiting pro bono vet onsite to do mass spay/neuters again. For SAGA to allow one animal to suffer due to its refusal to refer it to the private vet is just awful. So far, no one from SAGA or its supporters have stated what SAGA intends to do with regard to referring or getting sick or injured animals treatment. Is it now SAGA's policy not to pay Laurie Droke one penny even if it means life or death or suffering or treatment to an animal?