Yes, I understood that. I also understood that this sad story has been growing and becoming more fleshed out as these threads have gone on. But wasn't Dr. Droke complaining about the out of date drugs in general, and perhaps even before the latest incident that resulted in a beloved pet's passing, knowing all along that she was providing SAGA with out of date drugs? And further in that particular regard, how can anyone including Dr. Droke even be sure that she could have saved the dog had it been brought to her sooner? That is a strawman argument.

A fish and a bird can fall in love, but where will they build their nest?