In retrospect I guess I don't object to a license. I use guides about 15 days a year in SP. Another $150US won't kill it. But the perception(mine) is what I object to, that's it's just another nickle and dime tax/fee. If it's a fishery resource protection issue, include everyone that fishes. If it's a marine environment issue then license the divers and the snorklers. I need a license at home,in every other state I've fished in, and in MX. A term license(monthly, annual) makes more sense, and it certainly needs to available in advance. If I get into SP at 2pm, get into a room by 3 with cocktails at 3:05, I really don't want to chase around for the license I'll need at 6am the next morning. I do think fishing with a licensed tour guide should be exempted. Those guys already pay their share.