But what good is that petition? I'd sign it if I thought it would help SAGA, but I don't. SAGA is not in the dire state they would have us believe. I have no idea what their current finances are, of course, but I do know that if what I have heard is true they will be allowed to have a vet for humane society work. As I understand it they will not be able to operate a commercial vet clinic, the reason being that there is already one nearby. So unless SAGA can drive SPAH out of business, which I don't see happening any time soon (nor do I see it as desirable, and that has nothing to do with personalities) they have NO OPTION but to work with SPAH.
Of the 190 neuters/spays reported as having been performed, I wonder how many of those were for owners who otherwise could not have afforded to have had it done. I have the impression that a number of well-heeled people took advantage of the free offer. Is that a proper use of SAGA's resources - providing free veterinary services to people who can readily pay? And if the objective was to reduce the business stream for SPAH, that would have been as improper as it was futile.
I am curious on some aspects of that mass neutering program. Were they done according to best veterinary practice? Were all the appropriate drugs used, because I believe they are very costly? And who did them, given that SAGA doesn't have its own vet? Did they get special dispensation for their new vet or did they bring another vet in?