@ Juan
My concern is why you feel that anything I've suggested is libelous? That's the number one problem I had in dealing with your group, how quickly the personnel seems to pucker up like a prune when anyone makes a comment or asks questions. I'd work on that, it's a real turn off. In actuality I'm helping your organization out and perhaps you don't realize it. I mentioned the high ground. To date I'm the only person to visit GBE who is not associated with your group to openly mention the high ground in this forum. That's a bonus for you guys.

In fact, anyone with reasonable eyesight should be able to spot all three patches of high ground in the last photo you posted. The pic is taken from a long way away, after all. If you squint your eyes a little and look at the aerial photo Juan posted you may notice three ever so slightly darker patches of vegetation along the right edge of the red border. One in the upper right corner, one midway along the right border and one in the lower right corner following the main southern most E/W road in the subdivision. Look at the picture and you'll see it. Anywhere else in the subdivision I'll bet you get wet. Of course my interpretation at nine miles away could be askew, which brings me to my next point...

Visit the lots, we share that same opinion. Anyone purchasing lots in the subdivision should take the time to go look at the terrain. That was my suggestion #2, I believe. Could be wrong about that. Let's scroll back up. Nope, I was right, suggestion #2. I recommend going with Juan since he will gladly give his time. (Can't imagine why you'd do that? What's in it for you? That's really generous.).

The most jaw dropping and laughable of your defensive mechanisms is in suggesting that I am libelous for recommending to someone that they seek a second opinion on their title or ask about information regarding utilities. Legitimacy would dictate that you should have absolutely NO qualms what-so-ever with inquiring minds. Or do you prefer that buyers remain uneducated and not verify the security of their purchase? Because we both know there is only one reason you would want that.

As for my final magic trick of the evening, I invite readers to look once again at the aerial photo in the bottom of your post, the one marked as "taken last week". For your consideration, Ladies and Gentleman, where is the sandy road labeled "Hardcore Road Base, Graded, Level Surface, After" in that aerial photo, because the only one I see stops at the edge of the subdivision exactly where I remember it ending eight months ago? That is a misrepresentation that has been propagated time and again by your organization's personnel, including fraudulent representation on the GBE website and I thank you for posting clear evidence of that to a public forum. Tell me publicly that there is a finished, sandy, level road anywhere in that subdivision when the aerial photo from "last week" says otherwise. Go ahead.

The craziest thing about this endeavor is that you could have simply represented the lots as what they actually are and not have to endure scrutiny. "Some of these lots are low and will require permitted filling", what's wrong with that statement and why haven't you made it? "Some of these lots may require permits to remove mangroves", is probably another comment which might be helpful for your organization to learn. "This is a picture of the road outside the subdivision, although we make no guarantee that roads actually inside the subdivision will be finished to same degree of completion", might have been a statement that a legitimate seller would mention. "Lots are being sold without guarantee of utility or vehicle access", might have been a perfectly forward and honest representation. Or perhaps you did mention the last one in the contract fine print? "For greater clarity, and without restricting the generality of the foregoing, the Seller makes no representation whatsoever with regard to the supply of land fill, road access, utility services or with regard to any other alterations or improvements to the Lands or the surrounding region." - GBE contract word for word.

Funny GBE would add that to the contract when their biggest advertisement campaign revolves around the fact that there will be road access and utilities?

Just give an honest representation, guys. Save people the headaches of buying into a money pit sight unseen or shelling out thousands for a trip to Belize to find out for themselves. You'll still sell your lots! But people will know what they are getting into. I have no problem buying a cheap, submersed lot with no road access or utilities for the advertised price when I know that's what I'm buying. Why wouldn't you want that? As always, I invite an open discussion on the subject.