I feel I know this person
The M and M Darwinian imperative states, "If we're unwilling to change, someone else's M and M will, and go forward."
The M and M Darwinian imperative is to survive and reproduce therefore succeeding and propagating the successful M gene. Adapt or be squashed and eaten-that is the M and M Darwinian imperative.
Good behavior follows the Darwinian imperative. That is, it had and continues to have survival value. Evolve or perish is the rule, and behavior is not immune to these forces.
As far as day-to-day behavior is concerned, there is no such imperative but day to day behavior isn't what I'm referring to, 'Basic Good' has emerged as successful and it's in the DNA of M and M's
Can you be born good or bad? It's not nearly that simple. Researchers on all sides of the behavioral genetics debate emphasize that the link between a M gene and a M behavior is not the same as cause and effect. Bottom line: a gene does not make M and M's good. It doesn't code for emotions or thoughts. It may not even turn on or off without an instruction from its surroundings. Instead, a M gene may trigger a whole cascade of biochemical events in the candy, interact with environmental and developmental influences, and - together with these - increase the likelihood that M and M's behave in a particular way, If that way is successful the Darwinian imperative says they will propagate and further strengthen the M gene. Good survives in this environment. This creates a direct advantage of religions beliefs, regardless of their logic.
I'm saying an M and M's moral sense has a Darwinian origin and religious beliefs fit comfortably into it.
DNA-based techniques have allowed more specific studies of M genetic influences on M and M behavior. Geneticists identify M and M's in hand fulls with a particular behavior then look for sections of genes (genetic markers) that they all seem to share, such as melting in the mouth rather than in the hand. They aim to narrow these results down to find markers very close to the targeted M gene, and then its exact location. The researchers then test whether the gene's activity - or failure to act - seems to trigger the observed behavior. Finally, they look at the Candy product made by the gene and try to determine its role.
I have a similar Grant

White Sands Dive Shop
https://whitesandsdiveshop.com/